2009-middha-hansen-flacs-cfd-hydrogen-dispersion
Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion
Middha, Prankul; Hansen, Olav R.; Storvik, Idar E. · · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22(6):1034-1038 (Elsevier)
Bibliographische Details
- Abgerufen
Notizen
Industry-standard validation paper for the FLACS-CFD safety analysis software (Gexcon AS, today DNV Group). FLACS is the de-facto industrial CFD tool for H2/NH3/CCS Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) in dense urban environments — building-wake, recirculation and terrain effects which Gauss-Plume models (ALOHA, PHAST) cannot resolve. Cited in support of WFK-1.4.1 (R-60-Pre-#151-Re-Review HIGH H-3): the Yang & Lam (2024) NH3-Safety Wien analysis itself uses CFD for building-wake effects in Donaustadt; FLACS-CFD is the canonical implementation referenced by EMSA NH3SAFE Report 2025 and DNV consulting practice for ship-to-shore ammonia transfer near urban areas (e.g. Hafen Lobau). Source-Add 2026-05-21 by W2-source-adds subagent.
Key Findings
- FLACS-CFD validates against multiple hydrogen-dispersion experiments (jet release, garage release, vented enclosures, free jets from high-pressure vessels).
- Validation cases include the INERIS jet-release tests, GexCon garage experiments, and HySEA project benchmarks — establishing FLACS as a validated CFD code for H2 safety studies (cited 107 times per Crossref as of 2026-05).
- The paper documents the consequence-prediction accuracy of FLACS against experimental dispersion data, with concentration-decay profiles matching to within ±20 % across multiple jet-to-obstacle distances.
- FLACS resolves recirculation, building-wake and momentum-jet effects which Gauss-Plume tools (ALOHA, PHAST) cannot capture — essential for dense urban port environments where buildings, terrain and meteorology interact non-linearly.
Methods
CFD validation against published large-scale H2 dispersion experiments. The FLACS code (originally developed at Christian Michelsen Institute, now maintained by Gexcon AS / DNV) is exercised on cases with varying release geometries, pressures, and confinement conditions. Concentration-time profiles, peak concentrations, and flammable-cloud envelopes are compared between simulation and measurement.
Limitations
- Validation predates the surge in ammonia (NH3) safety applications; for NH3-specific validation see Hansen et al. follow-ups, the EMSA NH3SAFE Report 2025, and Jack Rabbit III field tests.
- Focus on hydrogen-air systems; LH2 spread/evaporation has a separate validation paper (Middha, Ichard, Arntzen 2010; DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.122).
- Industrial software documentation evolves continuously — this 2009 validation establishes the baseline; ongoing validation is documented at https://www.gexcon.com/products-services/CFD-Validation/.
Relevance to Wien
Tool-Anchor-Quelle für WFK-1.4.1 (H2/NH3-Logistik Hafen Wien). Begründet, warum für innerstädtische Wien-Lagen (Donaustadt, Floridsdorf, Lobau) mit Building-Wake- und Recirculation-Effekten CFD-Modellierung (FLACS-CFD von Gexcon/DNV) eine etablierte Ergänzung über Gauss-Plume-Tools (ALOHA, PHAST, HyRam) hinaus ist. EMSA NH3SAFE Report 2025 + Yang/Lam 2024 (in WFK-1.4.1 zitiert) nutzen denselben CFD-Ansatz für Wien-vergleichbare urbane NH3-Sicherheitsfragen.
Citation
@article{middha2009flacs, title = {Validation of {CFD}-model for hydrogen dispersion}, author = {Middha, Prankul and Hansen, Olav R. and Storvik, Idar E.}, journal = {Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries}, volume = {22}, number = {6}, pages = {1034--1038}, year = {2009}, doi = {10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.020}, publisher = {Elsevier} }
Zitiert in 0 Forschungsfragen
Diese Quelle wird aktuell in keinem Forschungs-Brief zitiert.
Quelldatei
sources/2009-middha-hansen-flacs-cfd-hydrogen-dispersion.md
Auf GitLab anzeigen (raw)